medmeters.
CLINICAL TEST LIBRARY · LONG-TERM PLATFORM ROADMAP

Established protocols.
New ways to document them.

Explore proposed camera-assisted measurement workflows across rehabilitation and other medical specialties. Our first commercial focus is a compact Functional Mobility Assessment package for outpatient physical therapy. Each additional protocol requires its own technical and clinical validation.

← Back to the first product
FOR OUTPATIENT PHYSICAL THERAPY · EARLY DEVELOPMENT

One familiar test.
Less manual documentation.

MedMeters is building a camera-assisted workflow for clinical assessments physical therapists already perform. Capture a standard test, review the measurement, compare visits and prepare a report for the patient chart — without retyping results.

✓ Standard protocol✓ Clinician-reviewed✓ Comparison across visits
Starting narrow, built to expand. First customer: outpatient rehabilitation clinics. Broader medical measurement modules and EHR integrations remain the platform roadmap.
Illustrative supervised chair-stand assessment in a physiotherapy clinic30-SECOND CHAIR STAND · CDC STEADI
From a routine test to a reviewable resultExample assessment · illustrative, not live CV
CLINICIAN REVIEW
Baseline9
Follow-up12
Difference+3
01 / First product

Start with one standard test.
Finish with a useful record.

Our first workflow focuses on a familiar lower-extremity functional assessment — the CDC STEADI 30-Second Chair Stand. It has explicit test rules and a simple endpoint: completed stands in 30 seconds.

Illustrative clinician-supervised sit-to-stand assessment
CDC STEADI · 30-SECOND CHAIR STAND

A familiar assessment.
A more usable result.

17-inch chair, arms crossed, 30-second window, clinician nearby for safety. Proposed camera processing requires its own validation.

Read the official CDC test protocol ↗
01

Perform the established test

A physical therapist guides the patient and confirms standard setup and safe execution.

02

Count and flag by camera

The proposed CV pipeline tracks sit-to-stand transitions, counts candidate repetitions and flags ambiguous events for review.

03

Confirm and compare

The clinician verifies the count and, when requested, compares it to prior tests performed in similar conditions.

04

Get a report-ready result

Record count, protocol, capture quality and comparison in an exportable summary — without double data entry as the target workflow.

Proposed workflow, not a deployed or clinically validated measurement service. The photo is an illustrative clinical scene.

02 / What the clinic receives

The result of the test.
Ready for a clinician.

Our goal is not another motion dashboard. It's a structured measurement, the context needed to trust it, and an easy path into the existing patient chart.

✓Count of completed stands, with any uncertain events flagged
✓Protocol details, test date and comparable prior results
✓Clinician confirmation before patient-facing or EHR use
✓Exportable report without copying numbers between tools

The numbers shown are invented to illustrate report design, not measurements produced by MedMeters.

Functional assessment report / 30s Chair StandSAMPLE DATA
Baseline9 reps
Latest visit12 reps
Change+3 reps
1210891012BaselineVisit 2Visit 3
Illustrative follow-up comparison · 30 seconds · same test rules required
Review status: pending clinician confirmationNo inference of clinical improvement
03 / Clinical design partner program

Help prove the workflow
is worth buying.

We're seeking outpatient physical therapy practices to help evaluate a focused camera-assisted assessment workflow. First we'll test whether it produces usable measurements and saves real staff time — including setup, review and documentation.

Design-partner discussions, not an offer of an FDA-cleared product or a live clinical trial. No accuracy or time-savings claims are made yet.

01 · Measurement reliabilityAgreement with clinician reference scoring; quality flags and refusal to score ambiguous footage.
02 · End-to-end workflow timeCapture + setup + review + exporting into the clinic's current patient record.
03 · Routine usageCan clinicians repeat the workflow without a research team prompting them?
04 · Willingness to payCan the budget owner define a paid next step if the evaluation succeeds?
Built around established clinical frameworks — with privacy-first intake and longitudinal comparison
CDC STEADIAPTA / ANPTCMS Section GGATSRehab Measures
Sources of reference protocols; no endorsement implied.
Why MedMeters

Not another video analysis tool.
Less work from test to chart.

The clinical value must be tested end to end: setup, measurement, clinician review and saving the result. Privacy and interoperability support this workflow — they are not a substitute for it. What clinical validation research tells us ↗

01 /

Less manual documentation

Design for protocol measurements and report-ready records that clinicians do not have to transcribe twice; quantify the actual time saved in pilots.

02 /

Repeatable measurement quality

Defined camera positions, test conditions, units, measurement uncertainty and quality checks for each assessment.

03 /

Progress, not snapshots

Optional comparison against a previous visit or a complete series. Clinicians see what changed — and what is truly comparable.

04 /

Clinic-to-home continuity

Bring selected, clinician-assigned low-risk tests into guided home workflows without changing the underlying measurement model.

05 /

Built to integrate

Designed for structured outputs and review workflows that healthcare platforms may embed through future API and FHIR integrations.

One measurement shows a moment. A series reveals the trajectory.Explore privacy & comparison
A better measurement workflow

How it works.
One standard protocol, end to end.

The same structured measurement can support a clinician's documentation and a patient's understanding of progress. Clinical decisions always remain with the care team.

01
Select a protocol

Choose a recognized assessment with a specified setup, required equipment and safety considerations.

02
Capture the test

Guide the camera view, record movement and detect timing, repetitions or joint landmarks.

03
Review the result

Show measurements with source video, quality checks and an editable clinician confirmation step.

04
Document progress

Compare like-for-like sessions and prepare structured, reviewable clinical results for reporting.

Older adult performing a chair-stand movement while a physical therapist supervisesCDC STEADI · STANDARDIZED CLINICAL TEST
How it works · One real example

30 seconds. One clinical protocol. A measurable result.

Using the CDC 30-Second Chair Stand, see how a clinician sets up a standard assessment, captures movements, verifies the count and compares repeat visits.

30 sfixed duration
12 repssample result
+3sample vs baseline

Results shown are illustrative. CDC requires a clinician next to the patient for safety; home use would require a separately evaluated adaptation.

Walk through the clinical test ↗
Three deployment paths

At the point of care.
Beyond the exam room.

One protocol model, adapted to the setting and clinician-approved safety requirements.

Clinician guiding a knee assessment while a camera records in clinic
01 · CLINIC

Measure during the visit.

Guided capture, immediate review, traceable measurements and structured documentation in the clinician's workflow.

Clinician-led assessment
Supported home mobility assessment with a remote clinician on a tablet
02 · HOME

Extend the assessment home.

Eligible patients repeat assigned low-risk tests independently or with video guidance, with safety and quality gates.

Self-test or remote-guidedEvidence on home testing ↗
Camera-assisted occupational therapy assessment with hands and clinical equipment
03 · PLATFORMS

Embed it in existing software.

Proposed capture SDK and structured measurement outputs for EHRs, digital health services and care networks.

API / OEM integration concept
The MedMeters clinical test library

Real clinical protocols.
One measurement library.

Explore research-ready protocol specifications with exact test procedures, camera measurements, validation questions and original clinical references. The wider library includes additional exploratory candidates.

Clinical evidence: a 2026 validation study compared automated scoring with clinician measurements for Sit-to-Stand, TUG and SPPB in 228 adults. Read the study summary ↗
A defined research roadmap

Specific protocols. Verifiable endpoints.

Published clinical tests first, MedMeters camera-capture specifications where no unified video standard exists. Every card links to the original reference and describes what we propose to validate.

Research candidates · No clinical measurements are currently being performed by this demonstration website.See the full assessment catalog ↘
—Candidate tests & workflows
12Clinical assessment families
3Clinic & remote modes
1Consistent data model
Explore clinical assessment protocolsConcept catalog · Validation pending
Modes indicate potential workflows after safety assessment and validation, not universal permission to test at home. Standards are cited for reference; MedMeters does not claim clinical validation, FDA authorization, or affiliation with standards organizations. Patient questionnaires are not CV measurements.
Built for trusted measurement workflows

Protect at capture.
Compare across visits.

Two design commitments: reduce identifiable video before transfer when clinically feasible, and allow requested, like-for-like comparisons with previous assessments.

01 / Privacy-first capture

De-identify video as early as possible.

Design for on-device detection and redaction of faces and other visible identifiers before footage leaves the capture device, where the assessment allows it. Prefer derived motion data over retaining identifiable video.

Original capture
On device
Redacted video
Or derived metrics
✓ Configurable face / identifier masking
✓ Protocol-specific privacy safeguards
✓ Minimal retention by design

Research: SecurePose validated automated face blurring on 116 clinical gait videos ↗

Blurring faces is not guaranteed anonymization: gait, body shape, voice, surroundings and metadata can still identify people. Facial neurology and some pediatric protocols may require different handling. HIPAA safeguards remain necessary.
02 / Longitudinal comparison

Compare the same test over time.

When requested and authorized, align the current assessment with one or more previous sessions. Give clinicians a reviewable trend, then share an approved explanation with the patient.

Research: How clinicians can interpret meaningful change over time ↗

Example · Knee active flexion / 3 visits
95°Baseline
102°Visit 2
108°Visit 3
+13° from baseline · Numerical change only
✓ One prior visit or complete history
✓ Same-protocol comparability checks
✓ Clinician-facing and patient-facing views
Illustrative values. A numerical difference is not automatically a clinically meaningful improvement. Comparison depends on protocol, setup, uncertainty and clinician review.
Evidence-linked clinical reports

A measurement is a point.
Progress is the story.

Compare the current test with one prior assessment or a longer history when requested. Keep protocol conditions, uncertainty and clinician review attached to every change — then make the approved trend understandable to patients.

Evidence context: Meaningful change is not the same as a numerical difference ↗

✓Protocol, body side, measurement unit, source video and capture conditions
✓Quality flags and repeatability checks, not false precision
✓Optional comparison with one or multiple earlier sessions, including clinician interpretation
✓Structured note draft, clinician sign-off and patient-readable summary
Assessment report / interactive sampleILLUSTRATIVE

Right knee flexion

Active ROM · two comparable visits

Draft · review required
108°+13° from baseline
BaselineVisit 2Current
AssessmentKnee AROM · v1.0 (concept)
Data qualityPending clinician check
The recorded knee flexion increased from 95° to 108°. Your clinician should determine whether this difference is meaningful for your goals.

Values and charts are fabricated examples; no live camera analysis or patient records are connected.

Designed for existing clinical workflows

Not a new EHR.
A measurement step inside yours.

The target design: launch an assessment in the software clinicians already use, capture only what the protocol needs, return reviewable measurements and patient progress without a second chart.

01 · ORDERStart from a patient encounter

Selected protocol, patient context and authorized clinician.

02 · CAPTUREClinic or guided home test

Camera positioning, safety criteria and local redaction options.

03 · MEASUREClinical endpoints + quality

Timing, angles, repetitions and protocol-specific quality flags.

04 · REVIEWCompare with baseline

One or multiple prior visits, checked for comparability.

05 · RETURNSave in the existing EHR

Draft observations, PDF and patient-facing summary after approval.

For clinicians

One patient record, less re-entry.

A physician or therapist stays in the familiar documentation workflow while MedMeters handles guided capture and draft measurements.

For care networks

Comparable measures across visits.

Standardized protocols and metadata make trends reviewable across clinic and selected home settings.

For software partners

An embeddable capability.

Start with a report, then progress to API callbacks, FHIR R4 mapping or white-label capture as an integration is validated.

For EHRs, digital care platforms & integrators

The measurement layer
your platform can own.

MedMeters is designed as a reusable measurement layer, not another medical record system. Healthcare vendors could embed guided capture, privacy controls, repeat-assessment comparisons and structured results into their existing workflows.

  • Candidate REST API and SDK integration model
  • FHIR-aligned measurements and report representations
  • White-label possibilities for healthcare vendors
  • Protocol-specific capture, redaction settings and quality metadata
  • Optional longitudinal comparison across prior visits and settings
Integration options & EHR workflows

Integration examples describe proposed capabilities. No production API, Epic/InterSystems integration or partner certification is claimed.

medmeters / integration example
Concept schema only · Not a live API endpoint
One platform · many clinical settings

Built for the people
who measure recovery.

Start with movement and function. Extend the same measurement, reporting and interoperability layer to new clinical specialties as individual protocols are validated.

01.

Physical therapists & rehab clinics

Document joint ROM, sit-to-stand, gait speed and functional progress with reviewable data rather than manual transcription.

02.

Post-acute & home health

Support observation and structured evidence for mobility workflows while clinicians retain responsibility for Section GG scoring.

03.

Healthcare platforms

Add measurement capabilities to an existing EHR, patient portal or clinical software through a future SDK/API offering.

For Physical Therapists · Priority clinical audience

Measure what you already assess.

30-Second Chair Stand, 5xSTS, TUG, gait speed and joint ROM — designed for clinician review and comparable follow-up. See the specialty workflows and planned protocols.

For Physical Therapists & clinical teams ↗
THE WORK BEHIND THE IDEA

MedMeters grew out of real-world projects. Years spent measuring movement.

From clinician-reviewed infant movement videos to multi-camera 3D reconstruction and remote body scanning, our work at Keepriot shaped how we think about clinical measurements: measurable, repeatable and reviewable.

Meet the team & explore our history Built in Cyprus · Concept in development
Illustrative child movement observation in a clinical setting01 / Clinical review
Illustrative camera-assisted movement assessment in a rehabilitation clinic02 / Movement measurement
SCANCHILD → FIGHT.VISION → MEDMETERS
First clinical design partners

Can we make a routine assessment
easier to document?

We are designing a focused pilot with outpatient PT clinics to validate scoring, time savings, repeated usage and the path to a paid workflow. No live clinical product is offered yet.

Explore the PT pilot
Frequently asked questions

Good measurements
start with good questions.

A transparent view of the proposed platform, what it could support and where professional judgment stays essential.

Is MedMeters currently a clinically validated product?

No. This website presents a product and protocol catalog under development. Clinical performance, intended use, regulatory pathway and scope of deployment must be validated before clinical use. Sample measurements are illustrative.

Can every test be done independently at home?

No. Home suitability varies by test, patient capability, assistive equipment, fall risk and environment. Some assessments require trained clinicians, spotting, marked distances or physical test equipment. The catalog shows possible future modes, not universal eligibility.

Does the camera replace clinical judgment?

No. Camera-derived outputs may support quantitative observation. The clinician reviews and interprets findings, determines the care plan and confirms official scores when required. A numerical change alone does not prove clinical improvement.

Can MedMeters connect to an existing EHR?

Our proposed architecture includes structured measurements, FHIR-aligned exchange and integration interfaces. These are product goals, not currently available connectors. We are interested in discussions with EHR vendors and integration partners.

Which assessments are you prioritizing first?

The initial research focus is knee and shoulder active ROM, Five Times Sit-to-Stand, 30-Second Chair Stand and Timed Up and Go. Further categories are candidates for future technical and clinical validation.

What about HIPAA and FDA?

Potential clinical software functions must be assessed under applicable FDA rules, and processing protected health information on behalf of US covered entities typically requires suitable HIPAA safeguards and agreements. We do not claim regulatory clearance or certifications for the concept shown here.